|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,525
|
Jer and Zach are to totally different people.
no i don;t think it should because if they do that Jake wouldn;t be shown at all and he has little air time as it is. Jake is part of the family good , bad or indifferent LPBW is all about the roloff family, editing that stuff takes the point away completely if he wanted that to be kept private then he shouldn't be on the show. Jake is the youngest and like Amy pointed out in season one he is sometimes left out. If Jake wants to act older than he is then he has to take the good with the bad. i have no brothers or sisters but i do have cousins we were close enough for them to treat me like a little sister and i got my fair share of crap growing up.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
I hope you don't think that you see everything that the Roloff's do on the screen. They show us just 1 hour a week for just a few weeks of the year. They cut out tons and tons of stuff all the time, I'm sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,525
|
no i don;t think that.
im not naive please don;t assume that i am.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 20,897
|
And if and when he does get tired of it he'll stop. Plain and simple.
Point is, I do not see anything strange or alarming happening between these siblings. Everything I've seen on this show between them I've seen before between my own sisters and myself or other friends and their siblings. Jake also knows that if he doesn't want to be on the show he doesn't really have to. Just like when Molly decided not to be filmed much in the first few seasons. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 20,897
|
I think that's where the problem lies. You, and others, look at it as them fighting. I have yet to see them really fight. Instead, it always starts off as play and just usually ends up with Jake getting hurt because either A) he's small or B) he doesn't know when to stop. But to say that they are actually physically fighting, I disagree totally.
And if he was REALLY getting hurt, I'm positive Amy or Matt or some other adult, if they were around, would step in. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Using the above perspective, the question of Zach smacking Jake (for any reason) may not be an appropriate choice. If they were younger, it might be considered acceptable. At Zach's age, it now becomes more inappropriate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 20,897
|
Well, until I see Zach hitting the streets kicking someone's a**, I doubt we have anything to worry about. LOL
Jesus, there are tons of siblings that smack one another around. Even if one of them is over 18. They are PLAYING. It's not malicious at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,460
|
I know and I agree DS, I mean my boys were at eachother today. If I weren't home I don't know how it would have ended.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 20,897
|
Oh I hate it too when the younger/smaller ones get hurt (in any situation). But, Jake has said himself, many times, that he likes it (horsing around like that). And he laughs about it. So, I would think that if he was really worried/hurt/etc. about it he'd stop.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|